麻豆映画

• EXCESS INSURER'S NON-FOLLOW FORM EXCLUSIONARY LANGUAGE BARS COVERAGE DESPITE PAYMENT BY ALL UNDERLYING INSURERS
• PLAIN MEANING OF INSURANCE: IF FACTS ALLEGED IN A COMPLAINT FALL WITHIN POLICY鈥橲 COVERAGE, INSURER HAS TO PAY
• SURGICAL CENTER鈥橲 PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY COVERAGE RESCINDED DUE TO MISREPRESENTATIONS ON RENEWAL APPLICATION
• COURT RELIES ON POLLUTION EXCLUSION TO HOLD D&O INSURER HAS NO DUTY TO DEFEND OR INDEMNIFY
• FAILURE TO TIMELY REPORT SUIT AGAINST ENTITY BARRS COVERAGE FOR OFFICERS SUBSEQUENTLY ADDED TO LITIGATION
• 鈥淚NTERRELATED鈥� LEGAL MALPRACTICE CLAIM BARRED FROM COVERAGE UNDER PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY POLICY
• SUPREME COURT OF SOUTH DAKOTA ALLOWS STATE STATUTE TO CONTROL OVER POLICY

• PRIOR KNOWLEDGE EXCLUSION IN WARRANTY LETTER BARS COVERAGE FOR SEC AND DOJ SUITS UNDER D&O POLICY
• BROAD EXCLUSIONS IN D&O POLICY DO NOT PRECLUDE COVERAGE FOR FALSE CLAIMS ACT SETTLEMENT
• PUNCTUATION MATTERS IN CREDIT UNION鈥橲 COVERAGE FOR CONSUMER CLASS ACTION
• THEFT OF FUNDS EXCLUSION PRECLUDES COVERAGE UNDER PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY POLICY
• DOJ INVESTIGATING BOARD SEATS UNDER THE CLAYTON ACT
• NEW DOJ CORPORATE CRIMINAL ENFORCEMENT POLICIES
• IRRECONCILABLE 鈥淥THER INSURANCE鈥� CLAUSES RESULT IN PRORATED DEFENSE COSTS

• INSUREDS HAD DUTY TO DISCLOSE ONGOING SEC INQUIRY IN WARRANTY LETTER
• WHAT DOES "CORRELATED" MEAN? THIS COURT PULLED OUT ITS DICTIONARY TO EXPLAIN
• OKLAHOMA FEDERAL COURT SAYS INSURER MUST SHOW PREJUDICE UNDER CLAIMS-MADE POLICY
• COURT RULES IN FAVOR OF D&O POLICYHOLDER SEEKING COVERAGE FOR RELATED ANTITRUST SUITS
• CGL POLICY CANNOT COMPENSATE FOR ADSENSE OF D&O COVERAGE
• INSIDER-TRADING ALLEGATIONS FALL WITHIN D&O POLICY'S DEFINITION OF 'SECURITIES CLAIM'
• DELAWARE COURT RULES DO POLICY COVERS CHOCOLATIER IN DISPUTE OVER FALSE LABEL
• FAILURE TO PREVENT A CYBER-HACK NOT A BREACH OF OVERSIGHT DUTY

• CLAIMS CONCERNING PRE-IPO TRANSACTIONS NOT INTERRELATED UNDER D&O POLICY
• DELAWARE EXPANDS EXCULPATION TO CORPORATE OFFICERS
• NO COVERAGE FOR COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT SUIT UNDER PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY POLICY
• DELAWARE SUPREME COURT RULES FOR SHAREHOLDERS IN APPRAISAL RIGHTS LAWSUIT
• A "SPECIAL" STANDARD FOR SPECIAL LITIGATION COMMITTEES
• SOPHISTICATED INSURED WILL NOT RECEIVE PROTECTIONS OF CONTRA PROFERENTEM

• INSURER SEEKS TO RESCIND CYBER POLICY DUE TO MISREPRESENTATIONS IN APPLICATIONS
• DELAWARE CHANCERY COURT RELIES ON ZUCKERBERG THREE PRONG TEST
• SPAC REVENUE PROJECTIONS NOT TANTAMOUNT TO FRAUD
• UNREGISTERED SECURITIES EXCLUSION IN PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY POLICY RELIEVES INSURER OF DEFENSE OBLIGATION
• BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCLUSION IN PRIVATE EQUITY LIABILITY POLICY PRECLUDES DEFENSE OBLIGATION IN DRUG CARTEL FRAUD CASE
• ERISA CASE INVOLVING MUTUAL FUND CLASS SELECTION MOVES FORWARD

• 9TH CIRCUIT UPHOLDS DELAWARE FORUM SELECTION CLAUSE, DISMISSING "CORPORATE DIVERSITY" DERIVATIVE SUIT
• FEDERAL JUDGE ALLOWS SECURITIES CLASS ACTION AGAINST GLOBAL BANK TO PROCEED
• CONTRACT EXCLUSION IN D&O POLICY PRECLUDES COVERAGE
• PRE-MERGER CONDUCT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE WRONGFUL ACT UNDER D&O POLICY
• D&O INSURERS TO PAY $124M OPIOID-RELATED DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT
• D&O INSURER'S DUTY TO DEFEND SEPARATE FROM DUTY TO INDEMNIFY
  UNTIMELY NOTICE UNDER CRIME POLICY NOT EXCUSED BY NOTICE-PREJUDICE EXCEPTION

听

• HOSPITALITY COMPANY'S CYBERSECURITY DISCLOSURES DID NOT VIOLATE SECURITIES LAWS
• CASES INVOLVING INTERRELATEDNESS RESULT INOPPOSING OUTCOMES
• CALIFORNIA UPHOLDS FEDERAL FORUM PROVISIONS IN IPO SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION
• ACTUAL RATHER THAN CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE DETERMINES WHEN CLAIM IS MADE UNDER LIABILITY POLICY
• COURT FINDS BANK'S OVERDRAFT FEES ARE NOT USURY
  CHANCERY RULES ACQUISITION OF SOLAR POWER COMPANY WAS "ENTIRELY FAIR"

听

• COURT KEEPS INVESTORS鈥� FRAUD ALLEGATIONS ALIVE IN CYBERSECURITY-RELATED SECURITIES SUIT
• DERIVATIVE SUIT DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO SPECIFICALLY ALLEGE DEMAND FUTILITY UNDER OHIO LAW
• SCOTUS LIMITS FEDERAL JURISDICTION TO CONFIRM OR VACATE ARBITRATION AWARDS
• BROAD 鈥楩INANCIAL REMUNERATION鈥� EXCLUSION PRECLUDES COVERAGE UNDER PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY POLICY
• COURTS CONSISTENTLY APPLY INSURED VS. INSURED EXCLUSIONS IN D&O POLICIES
• SETTLEMENTS FOR HIPAA VIOLATIONS EXCLUDED AS 鈥楩INES AND PENALTIES鈥� UNDER CGL POLICY
• FEE EXCLUSION IN D&O POLICY IS INAPPLICABLE